We’ve been recommending Dyson cordless stick vacuums for years. In our tests, they are simply far better at cleaning than any other stick vac out there. But some have raised serious questions about reliability. Senior writer Liam McCabe delves into the confusion around Dyson stick vacs and why we stand by our recommendation despite the concerns.
Subscribe! https://bit.ly/2TbshIv
For more on why Dyson gets a bad rap about reliability, check out our guide to the best cordless stick vacuums: https://wrctr.co/2vjiOUu
This video was not sponsored or paid for by Dyson in any way. All of Wirecutter’s recommendations are the result of independent research and testing by our team of writers and experts. Read more about what we do here: https://thewirecutter.com/about/
[ccw-atrib-link]
){kind=link}
Dyson IS overpriced and unreliable! They wouldn't get this reputation otherwise!! Good as a second 'quick cleaner' not good as an only vacuum cleaner. Batteries wear out after several years and need replacing at £60. The Max/Boost mode is only for quick tasks and not designed for cleaning whole rooms like that.
why would you have a cordless vacuum when they can’t suck nowhere as strong what is expected? + the brushes are weak too and I rather not mention the limited time of use thanks to the batteries.
We had two Dysons. The first one lasted five years and the second one lasted two. They absolutely suck when it comes to replacement parts. They stop making replacement parts after a few years so you end up having to buy aftermarket belts that snap every few weeks.
The second vacuum's motor stopped working after the second year.
Just buy a cheaper vacuum and save yourself $400+.
See Vacuum Wars channel for good tests, including the often overlooked air output filtration performance.
Dyson is overpriced.
Don't listen to these guys.