Cordless Cleaner Reviews

@krystianstepien5835 says:

It`s like to built the supercar without brakes.
It goes 0-60 in 2 sek and 300mph but only ones 🙂
Yeah we have the fastest car in the world.

@iPedro says:

A decade ago, I was at the 360 Eye debut. The engineers proudly demonstrated their beautiful round robot, too high to fit under furniture and too round to fit into corners.

In the hands on, I picked it up and put it in a corner to show the engineer that it wouldn’t clean corners. I suggested a D shape. He said they wanted to make it beautiful. Well, I guess they rethought that and he was right after all, this new robot is butt ugly. But again, Dyson is about appearances to the detriment of efficacy. They left much to be desired in the software front, let alone keeping up with modern expectations of auto empty capabilities.

Maybe next decade. I’ll stick with Roomba for now.

@wandameadows5736 says:

Dyson prices are a rip off

@HaysClark says:

As a 25+ year loyal Dyson customer, I'd have to say that the original Dyson 360 was the most disappointing products I've ever purchased from the company. I still have Dyson hand vacuums that are over 20 years old that still work perfectly after ordering a OEM or aftermarket replacement battery and a little TLC; however, the Dyson 360 is pretty much completely unserviceable and became cyber-trash after just 3 years.

@club2772 says:

4:48 lol instead of making a map it makes a goofy dinosaur drawing.

@ImPipkinrick says:

This look like it would've been a great prop in a Back to the Future movie.

@jasonden1005 says:

I rent, and I don’t know how old is the carpet.
Before I bought it, I used a v10 with carpet head, and patiently move 1 cm per second through the room — and havest fine dust that maybe could fit a 200ml can from 35 sqm carpet. And if I have the time to do it again, the volume of dust wasn’t significant lower.
considering recharging time, it took days to finish one room.
So I bought it — the most promising one by looking the structure.
I think it could match 20 % of result compare to me manually deep clean. I think it’s amazing because that deep clean takes an hour to finish 2 sqm.
I scheduled it 3 times a day.
The first week, every day, it sucks out some tiny things that I’m sure belong to previous tenants that even my manual deep clean couldn’t fully clean out — it was actually enjoyable to clean the bin as I see my place getting cleaner every day.
Now after 2 month, we have so much more confidence on the carpet than before.

Well worth the money as its strength happens to be what I need most.

@dragoonsunite says:

The value proposition is simple for me, the only vacuum you recommended for hair when I took your recommendation on my last pass through really was pretty horrible at exactly that… The vacuum I bought before that without doing user reviews or checking online was better purely by chance (Avoid Shark products as far as I'm concerned regardless of reccomndations from consumer product reviewers, some weird bias towards meaningless features when the products primary function is weak it seems to me). This just actually did the job better than any others, my carpets are actually clean, which is kind of the point, a low review when it does the primary function better than anything else on the market seems off to me. The idea that I can add an amazing feature package to a product that's designed to vacuum when it sucks at vacuuming and it somehow gets a better recommendations is weird to me.

@PurushNahiMahaPurush says:

The price is really laughable especially since for the same price I can get the Samsung Bespoke Jet Bot AI which is top of the line robot vacuum. Dyson needs a lot of catching up to do in this category.

@Shmikes says:

399 dollar product for sure

@xandercage193 says:

Scrap! Dyson is fooling his customers! The device can be less than a 400€ irobot vacuum robot